Home  ›  Is It Common for Moms Not to Let Grandmothers Not See Their Baby

Is It Common for Moms Not to Let Grandmothers Not See Their Baby

Written By Monday, March 14, 2022 Add Comment Edit
External audio
audio icon "Grandmothers Matter: Some surprisingly controversial theories of human longevity", Scientific discipline History Institute

The grandmother hypothesis is a hypothesis to explain the existence of menopause in man life history by identifying the adaptive value of extended kin networking. Information technology builds on the previously postulated "mother hypothesis" which states that as mothers historic period, the costs of reproducing become greater, and energy devoted to those activities would exist improve spent helping her offspring in their reproductive efforts.[1] It suggests that by redirecting their energy onto those of their offspring, grandmothers tin better ensure the survival of their genes through younger generations. By providing sustenance and support to their kin, grandmothers not only ensure that their genetic interests are met, but they also enhance their social networks which could translate into better immediate resource acquisition.[2] [3] This outcome could extend past kin into larger community networks and benefit wider group fettle.[4]

Background [edit]

One caption to this was presented by M.C. Williams who was the get-go to posit[5] that menopause might be an accommodation. Williams suggested that at some indicate it became more than advantageous for women to redirect reproductive efforts into increased support of existing offspring. Since a female person'due south dependent offspring would dice as shortly equally she did, he argued, older mothers should stop producing new offspring and focus on those existing. In so doing, they would avoid the historic period-related risks associated with reproduction and thereby eliminate a potential threat to the continued survival of current offspring. The evolutionary reasoning behind this is driven by related theories.

Kin selection [edit]

Kin selection provides the framework for an adaptive strategy past which donating behavior is bestowed on closely related individuals considering easily identifiable markers be to betoken them as probable to reciprocate. Kin choice is implicit in theories regarding the successful propagation of genetic material through reproduction, every bit helping an individual more likely to share i'due south genetic material would ameliorate ensure the survival of at to the lowest degree a portion of information technology. Hamilton'due south dominion suggests that individuals preferentially help those more related to them when costs to themselves are minimal. This is modeled mathematically equally r b > c {\displaystyle rb>c} . Grandmothers would, therefore, be expected to forgo their own reproduction once the benefits of helping those individuals (b) multiplied by the relatedness to that individual (r) outweighed the costs of the grandmother not reproducing (c).

Prove of kin selection emerged every bit correlated with climate-driven changes, around i.8 –i.vii million years ago, in female foraging and nutrient sharing practices.[vi] These adjustments increased juvenile dependency, forcing mothers to opt for a low-ranked, common nutrient source (tubers) that required developed skill to harvest and procedure.[vi] Such demands constrained female IBIs thus providing an opportunity for selection to favor the grandmother hypothesis.

Parental investment [edit]

Parental investment, originally put along by Robert Trivers, is divers as whatsoever do good a parent confers on an offspring at a cost to its ability to invest elsewhere.[7] This theory serves to explain the dynamic sex departure in investment toward offspring observed in most species. It is evident first in gamete size, as eggs are larger and far more energetically expensive than sperm. Females are also much more sure of their genetic relationship with their offspring, equally nativity serves as a very reliable marker of relatedness. This paternity uncertainty that males experience makes them less likely than females to invest, since it would exist plush for males to provide sustenance to another male'due south offspring. This translates into the grandparental generation, every bit grandmothers should be much more likely than grandfathers to invest in the offspring of their children, and more and so in the offspring of their daughters than sons.

The grandmother effect [edit]

Evolutionary theory dictates that all organisms invest heavily in reproduction in social club to replicate their genes. According to parental investment, human being females will invest heavily in their young because the number of mating opportunities available to them and how many offspring they are able to produce in a given amount of fourth dimension is fixed past the biology of their sex. This inter birth interval (IBI) is a limiting factor in how many children a woman tin accept considering of the extended developmental period that human children experience. Extended childhood, like the extended postal service-reproductive lifespan for females, is unique to humans.[8] Because of this correlation, man grandmothers are well-poised to provide supplemental parental intendance to their offspring's children. Since their grandchildren still carry a portion of their genes, it is all the same in the grandmother'southward genetic interest to ensure those children survive to reproduction.

Reproductive senescence [edit]

The mismatch between the rates of degradation of somatic cells versus gametes in human females provides an unsolved paradox. Why practice somatic cells decline at a slower rate and why practise humans invest more than in somatic longevity relative to other species?[9] Since natural selection has a much stronger influence on younger generations, deleterious mutations during later life become harder to select out of the population.[10]

In female placentals, the number of ovarian oocytes is fixed during embryonic evolution, mayhap as an adaptation to reduce the aggregating of mutations,[11] which then mature or dethrone over the life course. At birth there are, typically, ane million ova. However, by menopause, merely approximately 400 eggs would have actually matured.[12] In humans, the rate of follicular atresia increases at older ages (around 38-40), for reasons that are not known.[13] In chimpanzees, our closest nonhuman, genetic relatives, there is a very similar rate of oocyte atresia until the age of 35 at which point humans experience a far accelerated rate compared to chimpanzees.[fourteen] However, chimpanzee females, unlike humans, usually die while all the same in their reproductive phase.[2]

The aging procedure in humans leaves a dilemma in that females live past their ability to reproduce. The question poised to evolutionary researchers so becomes, why do human bodies live on so robustly and for and so long past their reproductive potential, and could there exist an adaptive do good to abandoning one's own attempts at reproduction to aid kin?

Alloparenting [edit]

The practise of dividing parenting responsibilities among non-parents affords females a cracking advantage in that they can dedicate more than try and energy toward having an increased number of offspring. While this practice is observed in several species,[15] information technology has been an specially successful strategy for humans who rely extensively on social networks. One observational study of the Aka foragers of Central Africa demonstrated how allomaternal investment toward an offspring increased specifically during times that the female parent'due south investment in subsistence and economic activities increased.[16]

If the grandmother effect were true, post-menopausal women should go on to work later on the cessation of fertility and use the proceeds to preferentially provision their kin. Studies of Hadza women have provided such evidence. A modernistic hunter-gatherer group in Tanzania, the mail service-menopausal Hadza women often help their grandchildren past foraging for food staples that younger children are inefficient at acquiring successfully.[8] Children, therefore, crave the assistance of an adult to gain this crucial version of sustenance. Often, however, mothers are inhibited by the care of younger offspring and are less available to help their older children fodder.[8] In this regard, the Hadza grandmothers get vital to the care of existing grandchildren, and let reproductive-historic period women to redirect energy from existing offspring into younger offspring or other reproductive efforts.

However, some commentators felt that the office of Hadza men, who contribute 96% of the mean daily intake of protein, was ignored;[17] though the authors accept addressed this criticism in numerous publications.[8] [18] [xix] [20] Other studies also demonstrated reservations almost behavioral similarities betwixt the Hadza and our ancestors.[21]

Maternal v. paternal grandmothers [edit]

Considering grandmothers should be expected to provide preferential treatment to offspring she is most certain of her human relationship to, there should be differences in the help she provides to each grandchild according to that relationship. Studies have found that not only does the maternal or paternal relationship of the grandparent affect whether or how much assistance a grandchild receives, simply also what kind of help. Paternal grandmothers oft had a detrimental consequence on infant mortality.[22] [23] Also, maternal grandmothers concentrate on offspring survival, whereas paternal grandmothers increment birth rates.[24] These finding are consequent with ideas of parental investment and paternity uncertainty. As, a grandmother could be both a maternal and paternal grandmother and thus in division of resources, a daughter's offspring should be favored.

Other studies accept focused on the genetic relationship betwixt grandmothers and grandchildren. Such studies take found that the effects of maternal / paternal grandmothers on grandsons / granddaughters may vary based on caste of genetic relatedness, with paternal grandmothers having positive effects on granddaughters simply detrimental furnishings on grandsons,[25] and paternity uncertainty may be less important than chromosome inheritance.[26]

Criticisms and alternative hypotheses [edit]

Some critics take cast uncertainty on the hypothesis considering while information technology addresses how grandparental care could have maintained longer female post-reproductive lifespans, it does not provide an explanation for how information technology would have evolved in the commencement place. Some versions of the grandmother hypothesis asserted that it helped explicate the longevity of human senescence. Even so, demographic data has shown that historically rising numbers in older people amidst the population correlated with lower numbers of younger people.[27] This suggests that at some indicate grandmothers were not helpful toward the survival of their grandchildren, and does not explain why the offset grandmother would forgo her own reproduction to assist her offspring and grandchildren.

In addition, all variations on the mother, or grandmother effect, fail to explicate longevity with continued spermatogenesis in males.

Some other problem concerning the grandmother hypothesis is that it requires a history of female philopatry. Though some studies suggest that hunter-gatherer societies are patriarchal,[28] mounting testify shows that residence is fluid among hunter-gatherers[29] [30] and that married women in at least one patrilineal lodge visit their kin during times when kin-based support tin be especially beneficial to a woman's reproductive success.[31] 1 study does suggest, however, that maternal kin were essential to the fettle of sons as fathers in a patrilocal society.[32]

It likewise fails to explain the detrimental effects of losing ovarian follicular activity. While connected post-menopausal synthesis of estrogen occurs in peripheral tissues through the adrenal pathways,[33] these women undoubtedly face up an increased hazard of conditions associated with lower levels of estrogen: osteoporosis, osteoarthritis, Alzheimer'due south disease and coronary avenue affliction.[34]

Even so, cross-cultural studies of menopause have institute that menopausal symptoms are quite variable amongst different populations, and that some populations of females do non recognize, and may not even feel, these "symptoms".[35] This loftier level of variability in menopausal symptoms across populations brings into question the plausibility of menopause every bit a sort of "culling agent" to eliminate not-reproductive females from competition with younger, fertile members of the species. This too faces the task of explaining the paradox betwixt the typical age for menopause onset and the life expectancy of female person humans.

See likewise [edit]

  • The How and the Why – a play based on the controversy surrounding the Grandmother hypothesis and the evolution of human reproduction
  • Postpartum confinement, a worldwide tradition in which the grandmothers care for the next generation
  • Patriarch hypothesis

References [edit]

  1. ^ Pavard, Samuel; Metcalf, C. Jessica East.; Heyer, Evelyne (five March 2008). "Senescence of reproduction may explain adaptive menopause in humans: A test of the "mother" hypothesis". American Journal of Concrete Anthropology. 136 (2): 194–203. doi:x.1002/ajpa.20794. PMID 18322919.
  2. ^ a b Dawkins, Richard (1976). The Selfish Gene . New York Metropolis: Oxford University Press. ISBN0-19-286092-5.
  3. ^ Alexander, R.D. (1974). "The Evolution of Social Behaviour". Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. five: 325–83. doi:x.1146/annurev.es.05.110174.001545.
  4. ^ Campbell, B. (1971). Human Evolution: An Introduction to Human being's Adaptations . Aldine. ISBN0-202-02013-4.
  5. ^ Williams, GC (1957). "Pleiotropy, natural selection, and the evolution of senescence". Development. 11 (4): 398–411. doi:10.2307/2406060. JSTOR 2406060.
  6. ^ a b O'Connell, J.F.; Hawkes, M.; Blurton Jones, Northward.Thou. (1999). "Grandmothering and the evolution of Homo erectus". Journal of Human Evolution. 36 (five): 461–485. doi:ten.1006/jhev.1998.0285. PMID 10222165. S2CID 23632650.
  7. ^ Trivers, Robert (1972). Parental Investment and Sexual Selection. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Visitor. p. 139.
  8. ^ a b c d Hawkes, K.; O'Connell, J.F.; Blurton Jones, N.Chiliad. (1997). "Hazda Women's Fourth dimension Allocation, Offspring Provisioning, and the Evolution of Long Postmenopausal Life Spans". Current Anthropology. 38 (4): 551–577. doi:ten.1086/204646. S2CID 55079065.
  9. ^ Hawkes, Chiliad. (2003). "Grandmothers and the development of human longevity". American Journal of Homo Biology. 15 (iii): 380–400. doi:10.1002/ajhb.10156. PMID 12704714. S2CID 6132801.
  10. ^ Croft, Darren P.; Brent, Lauren J.N.; Franks, Daniel W.; Cant, Michael A. (July 2015). "The development of prolonged life after reproduction". Trends in Ecology and Development. 30 (vii): 407–416. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2015.04.011. PMID 25982154.
  11. ^ Ellison, P.T. (2001). On Fertile Ground: Ecology, Evolution and Human Reproduction. Harvard Academy Press.
  12. ^ Baker, T.G. (1963). "A quantitative and cytological study of germ cells in human ovaries". Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences. 158 (972): 417–433. Bibcode:1963RSPSB.158..417B. doi:ten.1098/rspb.1963.0055. PMID 14070052. S2CID 85248483.
  13. ^ Hawkes, Kristen; Smith, Ken R. (25 August 2010). "Do women stop early on? Similarities in fertility refuse in humans and chimpanzees". Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 1204 (1): 43–53. Bibcode:2010NYASA1204...43H. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05527.x. PMC4043631. PMID 20738274.
  14. ^ Cloutier, Christina T.; Coxworth, James; Hawkes, Kristen (5 Feb 2015). "Age-related refuse in ovarian follicle stocks differ betwixt champanzees (Pan troglodytes) and humans". AGE. 37 (1): ten. doi:10.1007/s11357-015-9746-iv. PMC4317403. PMID 25651885.
  15. ^ Leggett, Helen C.; El Mouden, Claire Due east; Wild, Geoff; West, Stuart (12 October 2011). "Promiscuity and the development of cooperative convenance". Proceedings of the Purple Lodge B. 279 (1732): 1405–1411. doi:10.1098/rspb.2011.1627. PMC3282361. PMID 21993501.
  16. ^ Meehan, Courtney (xvi September 2009). "Maternal Time Allocation in 2 Cooperative Childrearing Societies". Man Nature. twenty (iv): 375–393. doi:10.1007/s12110-009-9076-2. S2CID 143942830.
  17. ^ Gurven, Thou.; Hill, 1000. (1997). "Comments on 'Hazda Women's Time Resource allotment, Offspring Provisioning, and the Evolution of Long Postmenopausal Life Spans'". Electric current Anthropology. 38 (four): 566–567. doi:10.1086/204646. S2CID 55079065.
  18. ^ Hawkes, Thou.; O'Connell, J.F.; Blurton Jones Northward.K. (2001). "Hadza Meat Sharing". Evolution and Human Behavior. 22 (ii): 113–142. doi:x.1016/S1090-5138(00)00066-0. PMID 11282309.
  19. ^ Hawkes, K.; O'Connell, J.F.; Blurton Jones N.G. (2001). "Hunting and nuclear families: some lessons from the Hadza about men's work". Current Anthropology. 42 (five): 681–709. doi:10.1086/322559. S2CID 146649034.
  20. ^ Hawkes, K.; O'Connell, J.F.; Coxworth, J.E. (2010). "Provisioning is not the but reason men hunt". Current Anthropology. 51 (2): 259–264. doi:x.1086/651074. S2CID 17545995.
  21. ^ Gibbons, A. (1997). "Why Life Later Menopause?". Science. 276 (5312): 535. doi:x.1126/science.276.5312.535b. S2CID 54142176.
  22. ^ Voland, Due east.; Beise, J. (2002). "Reverse Effects of Maternal and Paternal Grandmothers on Baby Survival in Historical Krummörn". Mpidr Wp 2001-026.
  23. ^ Jamison, C.S.; Cornell L.Fifty.; Jamison P.L.; Nakazato H. (2002). "Are all grandmothers equal? A review and a preliminary exam of the grandmother hypothesis in Tokugawa Japan". American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 119 (1): 67–76. doi:10.1002/ajpa.10070. PMID 12209574.
  24. ^ Mace, R.; Sear, R. (2004). "Are Humans Communal Breeders?". In Voland, East.; Chasiotis, A.; Schiefenhoevel, Westward. (eds.). Grandmotherhood – the Evolutionary Significance of the 2d Half of Female Life. Rutgers Academy Press.
  25. ^ Pull a fast one on, M; Sear R; Beise J; Ragsdale One thousand; Voland E; Knapp LA (2010). "Grandma plays favourites: X-chromosome relatedness and sexual activity-specific childhood mortality". Proceedings of the Majestic Club B. 277 (1681): 567–573. doi:x.1098/rspb.2009.1660. PMC2842695. PMID 19864288.
  26. ^ Play tricks, M; Johow J; Knapp LA (2011). "The Selfish Grandma Gene: The Roles of the X-Chromosome and Paternity Uncertainty in the Evolution of Grandmothering Behavior and Longevity". International Periodical of Evolutionary Biology. one: i–9. doi:10.4061/2011/165919. PMC3118636. PMID 21716697.
  27. ^ Hawkes, Kristen (xi March 2004). "Man longevity: The grandmother effect". Nature. 428 (6979): 128–129. Bibcode:2004Natur.428..128H. doi:10.1038/428128a. PMID 15014476. S2CID 4342536.
  28. ^ Peccei, J. South. (2001). "A critique of the grandmother hypotheses: Old and new". American Periodical of Human Biology. thirteen (4): 434–452. doi:10.1002/ajhb.1076. PMID 11400215. S2CID 23875936.
  29. ^ Alvarez, H. (2004). "Residence groups among hunter-gatherers: A view of the claims and evidence for patrilocal bands". In Chapais, B.; Berman, C (eds.). Kinship and Behavior in Primates. Oxford: Oxford University. pp. 420–442.
  30. ^ Marlowe, F (2004). "Marital residence amid foragers". Current Anthropology. 45 (2): 277–284. doi:10.1086/382256. JSTOR x.1086/382256. S2CID 145129698.
  31. ^ Scelza, B. (2011). "Female Mobility and Postmarital Kin Access in a Patrilocal Society". Human Nature. 22 (4): 377–393. doi:10.1007/s12110-011-9125-five. PMID 22388944. S2CID 23279976.
  32. ^ Strier, Karen B.; Chaves, Paulo B.; Mendes, Sergio L.; Fagundes, Valeria; Di Fiore, Anthony (22 November 2011). "Low paternity skew and the influence of maternal kin in an egalitarian, patrilocal primate". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 108 (47): 18915–9. doi:10.1073/pnas.1116737108. PMC3223441. PMID 22065786.
  33. ^ Labrie, F. (2010). "DHEA, of import source of sex steroids in men and even more in women". Neuroendocrinology: Pathological Situations and Diseases. Progress in Brain Inquiry. 182: 97–148. doi:ten.1016/S0079-6123(10)82004-7. ISBN9780444536167. PMID 20541662.
  34. ^ Massart, F.; Reginster, J.Y.; Brandi, M.L. (2001). "Genetics of Menopause-Associatred Diseases". Maturitas. twoscore (2): 103–116. doi:x.1016/S0378-5122(01)00283-three. PMID 11716989.
  35. ^ Melby, Melissa K. (2005). "Vasomotor symptom prevalence and language of menopause in Japan". Menopause. 12 (3): 250–257. doi:x.1097/01.gme.0000146108.27840.d9?. PMID 15879913.

monaghanalkinew.blogspot.com

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grandmother_hypothesis

0 Response to "Is It Common for Moms Not to Let Grandmothers Not See Their Baby"

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel